Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder
I agree that we should keep him for one more year.
The problem is that if he has another year like the last, we won't be able to trade him; he'll be a buy-out candidate.
Right now, there are probably some teams that might be willing to gamble that he had an off year, but those possible suitors definitely won't be interested in taking the gamble that he just had two off years.
There's no really good solution unfortunately, but I think patience may be the best course.
|
I actually never thought of that situation. I think there would be some desperate teams that would still want to trade for him IF he did have another bad year, but realistically I agree with you. I don't think anyone would want to trade for him.
I'd be willing to take a gamble and see if Neal will produce.