Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameX
I would keep Neal for one more year. If Neal doesn't produce then that's when we trade him.
|
I agree that we should keep him for one more year.
The problem is that if he has another year like the last, we won't be able to trade him; he'll be a buy-out candidate.
Right now, there are probably some teams that might be willing to gamble that he had an off year, but those possible suitors definitely won't be interested in taking the gamble that he just had two off years.
There's no really good solution unfortunately, but I think patience may be the best course.