Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Skeptical science is pretty dogmatic in their views. I wouldn't really look for them to have anything helpful to say on controversial studies that dispute their viewpoint, and I certainly don't hold them as the authority to look to when new information comes to light.
We should be listening to scientists who discuss these controversial points. That's what science is. Science is never settled.
|
If we're going to question Skeptical Science's bias, then we should absolutely be questioning the Financial Post's. Not sure why the National Post's bastard offspring of neoliberal sycophants has been given so much legitimacy on CP.