Is that a joke? Are you unaware of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
The problem with the impaired driving rules has nothing to do with interfering with your ability to operate your vehicle. The problem is that they force you to provide evidence against yourself to support potential criminal charges when the state has no reason to believe you've committed a crime. There is nothing remotely similar about the two cases.
If you wanted a car analogy, this would be like the government requiring all cars to have the radio on at all times and tuned so that they can interrupt whatever you may be listening to for a government alert message. Which might be annoying, but is not a violation of any legal right you have.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|