Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post - [Rumour] McKenzie: Hearing the Flames are very intent on moving one of Hamonic or Brodie

Royle9 · 06-04-2019, 08:35 AM

You're basically saying we cant afford to lose 2 D men.

Hypothetically we lose Brodie to Toronto for _____
Rasmus moves up and plays the 2 spot.

Under these circumstances you're saying we're okay with just having lost 1.
But if we lose 2 then our depth is gone (accurate assumption)

However, say we now trade Hamonic to WPG for ____ and and Dman then we're right back to technically being down 1 D.

This doesn't include Tre looking to go after a UFA D man or something OR potentially the Russian we picked up steps in. We can afford to lose both so long as we recoup 1 D via UFA/Trade which is my point.

I think we're fine with losing both ASSUMING we get a serviceable top 5/6 D man in return one way or another.
We CANNOT afford to lose BOTH and not get one in return.

06-04-2019, 08:35 AM	#242
Royle9 Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2010 Exp:	You're basically saying we cant afford to lose 2 D men. Hypothetically we lose Brodie to Toronto for _____ Rasmus moves up and plays the 2 spot. Under these circumstances you're saying we're okay with just having lost 1. But if we lose 2 then our depth is gone (accurate assumption) However, say we now trade Hamonic to WPG for ____ and and Dman then we're right back to technically being down 1 D. This doesn't include Tre looking to go after a UFA D man or something OR potentially the Russian we picked up steps in. We can afford to lose both so long as we recoup 1 D via UFA/Trade which is my point. I think we're fine with losing both ASSUMING we get a serviceable top 5/6 D man in return one way or another. We CANNOT afford to lose BOTH and not get one in return.