Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I would offer each of them a 2 year extension and who ever signs first stays. I'm okay if they end up trading both.Even though i like Hamonic more, I think Hamonics shelf life is less than Brodies, so i would not go over a 2 year deal.
|
Neither are going to sign that, their agents probably laugh as they hand up.
Twenty-eight years old, playing top four roles, one year away from free agency? These two are going to get paid, and five years is the minimum for the deal. In terms of dollars Hamonic will be the easiest to sign, doesn't put up points, wants to play out west or in Canada by all reports, but you bet he'l be pushing for six years.