View Single Post
Old 05-29-2019, 12:22 PM   #32
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
The suit was in relation to the driving range and not the course itself. It was also not in relation to damage caused by a golfer, but instead a nuisance factor. The judgement differentiates between the two and the potential for the nuisance complaint.

https://www.golf.com/special-features/cover-your-asset

"While the law varies from state to state — and from case to case — it’s rarely the offending golfer who is responsible for the damage. If you live on a golf course, you assume risk."

Even bodily injury is questionable.

https://www.cmaa.org/PcsTemplate.aspx?id=37197

The best course of action is to take it up with the facility where your property is located. Some courses will pay for or share in the cost of putting up protective nets on high risk locations. This is usually to prevent long term shenanigans between the land owner, facility, and golfers.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post: