View Single Post
Old 05-20-2019, 12:10 PM   #185
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Really? Then maybe we can bring in an arbiter to decide? Maybe we can bring in a Sufi to put their moral imperative as the standard by which we all have to live? Would that be fair? Or would you view that as not being fair to your worldview and your particular moral beliefs?

You're right, the issue is very complex. The only way to resolve this issue is to remove all the morality from it and make it a scientific study to determine the feasibility of fetuses at given stages of development. If we can have them make a determination that a fetus can survive on its own at "week X" without technological intervention, and a reasonable (80%) chance of survival, then I think that is the best resolution to this argument. If we could all agree on this, and abide by the findings, I think we would all be able to put this mess behind us. Sad thing is, there is one group I know for certain that will not.

What if the science says something like Week X is 15.
Neither side is happy.


The pro-life group is never happy because they want no abortions period.
The pro-choice group will not be happy because a women should get to choose, period.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote