Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
The argument of it doesn’t affect you so get out is not valid.
|
And why doesn't it? Why do YOU get to say what I do with my body or in the course of my life? If I want to participate in high risk activities, that's on me. You have no right to say that I can't juggle chainsaws and kittens at the same time. What happens is on me, not on you. Why is it that some people just feel obligated to regulate the things that others do because they don't like it?
Quote:
|
At some point whether in the womb or just outside it a life becomes a life and needs protecting. A person killing their two year old doesn’t really affect you either but no one is going to support that.
|
And you have no right to saw what a woman does with her womb. PERIOD. If you do, I get a say in what you do with your testes because the sperm that is generated there could ultimately become a person. No more jerking off for you! Gotta protect those possible babies!
A two year old, or even a new born baby, is a little bit different from a gop of cells that does not resemble human life in any shape or form. Again, we should be focusing in on what determines a human life and the sustainability of that life. Allow science to determine when an embryo becomes viable of sustaining itself without the sustenance or nutrients from the mother/host. Because if you start down that road, anything created in a petri dish is considered life and worthy of protection. IMO, human life doesn't start until the fetus can survive outside the womb without technological intervention. Once that happens, welcome to humanity. Oh, you still have no rights under the law, but carry on.
Quote:
|
You are just applying your morality of when that point occurs.
|
Yeah, that's the point. Keep your morality to yourself and allow the individual the right to do what they want with their own body as they see fit.