It seems to be taking that into account. The projections taking RFAs into their age 27 or 28 year are less than the projections eating up maximum UFA years. Isn't that the point of the term length column?
Term is irrelevant, but the age of the player at the end of the term is. They all want a big 8 year UFA contract at the earliest possible age to get it.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|