"Not even" Ken Holland can save the Oilers? Why "not even"? He's a terrible choice.
You've just had several years of Chiarelli, who had great success about a decade ago and is now a backwards-thinking dinosaur who the game has passed by and who hasn't been able to adjust to changes in the sport and nowadays just makes terrible deals to fill his lineup with borderline replacement players at too high a cost.
Today, you've replaced him with Ken Holland, who had great success about a decade ago and is now a backwards-thinking dinosaur who the game has passed by and who hasn't been able to adjust to changes in the sport and nowadays just makes terrible deals to fill his lineup with borderline replacement players at too high a cost.
How could this be considered a positive step?
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|