Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
I think Spurs are good enough to keep up with those top two though. Having an actual home stadium is important and provides a boost for sure. Of course they need to spend, but I feel like that gap between Spurs and City/Liverpool isn’t that enormous gulf of points.
But the fact is those two and United will spend a crazy amount of money this summer. The solution is always more money and that’s not likely to change.
|
No. You are objectively incorrect.
Spurs' problem hasnt been the lack of a home stadium although it has been fun watching you guys be the EPL's Hobos just bumming around from place to place, eating other people's food, begging for spare change and engaging in manslaughter in the hopes of a cheese sandwich reward.
As entertaining as all of that has been however, the real issue is that Spurs dont have the depth.
Thats not really a scathing indictment on them though, most teams dont have the depth required to compete in all competitions. Its expensive and difficult.
The only team that really has that degree of depth is City and they've been competing on all fronts until just recently and even then its been a stretch for them.