Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Notice how she called transsexual individuals "perversions"? Notice how she didn't take the opportunity to apologize for that? Isn't she brought up the whole having a man in a girl's lockerroom - which remind me again how that isn't the definition of fear mongering?
Imagine being called a pervert because of your sexual orientation and then have the party leader commend the person who called you a pervert. But we can't call them out for that, because that's a smear campaign  :r olleyes: . |
Do we seriously need the 6 rolling eyes to make a point? Your point was clear enough without them.
I would call it fear mongering if she decided to stay with the party and continue with her views vying for the seat in her area. Agree or not she felt her views would be a distraction and they would have been, so she stepped down. I'm glad she did.
Her views are not hurting anyone but herself, and since she is longer a UCP she can't have any of her views looked at by the party.
Quote:
|
And that's the issue. Where are the half-truths? Unverifiable rumours? The "smearing" has been done by the candidates and ex-candidates own words and actions. That's not smearing, not in my book.
|
How can it be an issue if she's no longer running for the UCP?