Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Well, I'm on the same side of the issue as you, but I don't love this take either. Is that what you propose, that laws be made on the basis of what people who are directly implicated by the outcome of those laws think the law should be? How could that possibly be an objective and unbiased method? Let's let sentencing guidelines for murder be dictated by murderers and their victims' families, while we're at it - they have first hand experience, after all.
|
The discussion has moved past this, but i’ll just clarify. I didn’t intend to suggest what you’re saying, only that there is enough non-hypothetical information out there from people actually directly impacted by policies like this that is worth seeking out.
Not that you have to agree or disagree with the UCP policy. Just that everyone from policy makers to people forming opinions on those policies could gain some valuable perspective from people directly affected.
...and that only gay people should make all policies from now on. You’re welcome in advance.