Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
Yeah I'm pretty sure CAPP, the government of Saskatchewan, Petroleum Services Association of Canada, Suncor, CNRL, Cenovus, Enbridge, Transcanada, Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, multiple banks, and others didn't even read the bill. Their opposition mostly focuses around the appropriation of "69" from sexual position term to legislation connotation.
|
Everyone on your list would bark at any proposed legislation that purports to require an assessment of their projects.
Truth be told - there is still no public word on exactly what projects the impact assessment act will apply to. The requirements in that proposed legislation are not much different from what is currently in existence - and how many projects has that stopped? Maybe a handful over 8 years. The pipeline delays have nothing to do with what is in bill c 69. In fact, I suspect nobody on either side of the political spectrum really loses any sleep over whether bill c 69 survives or not.