Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Again...her history and track record of anti-oil or at least not pro-pipeline, says something very different. Its just...fact.
In that very video she states there "is no point" to Northern Gateway. What does that mean to you if not that she wasn't willing to be on the forefront of fighting for a pipeline? By definition that is passively sewering that particular pipeline....no?
Im really trying to figure out this strange angle you are taking. Notley most certainly is anti-oil, that much is obvious. The only reason she has even looked like she is fighting for TMX is to....wait for it....try and retain power in the form of the Premiership, so she can further the well publicized NDP agenda. What part of this am I incorrect on?
|
This part?
Why is the possibility that being in power and understanding the issues more has changed their opinion not an option?