Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp
I totally agree with this. Sure, it feels good to have gotten a super great deal. But over time, if the GM is known as a fleecer, it may affect future dealings. Other GM's might try to avoid dealing with the Flames if they feel they might get fleeced in other deals. I really think that's what happened to Darryl Sutter.
|
Is there any evidence that this is true at all?
I would have to think GMs are all confident in their ability to make good deals. So even if they observe another GM losing a trade, they are going to think that they are "smart enough that it can't happen to me".
I just can't think of a single example of a good GM not being able to make trades.