View Single Post
Old 03-27-2019, 08:29 AM   #552
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Munroe View Post
The 100k mark is because I believe it is what the proposal was (110k maybe?) and not because I am pulling it as a random number.

Supporting 3 kids on 100k is different than supporting 1 kid on 100k. Supporting 1 kid on 100k income is not "barely getting by".
What about supporting 1 kid on 100k coming from 1 spouse?

Is it really fair that tax payers subsidize the household with 1 person working making 100k and 1 kid the same way they would subsidize a household with 4 kids with 2 people working making 50k each?
The NDP plan had no limit on income. I believe the AP plan may have but I have no idea where you got your numbers from.

How do you know supporing 1 kid on 100k is barley getting by? You literally have no idea how much a kid costs so I don't think you can make that statement.

Sorry it's really hard to talk with you about this subject because you really aren't informed on it and you don't seem to be open to seeing it from the other side.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Looks like you'll need one long before I will. May I suggest deflection king?
Hockeyguy15 is offline