Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I dont think people really understand the long-term consequences of this.
The thing is, it isnt just fudging the employment numbers. As we saw with the consolidation of AHS a major sticking point with Government jobs is that they are fantastic, their benefits are amazing and they are almost impossible to eliminate.
And when you do eliminate them, the people holding those jobs are very, very expensive to get rid of.
So by creating a bunch of additional positions you've employed a large segment of these people for the foreseeable future which effectively drops a 'Milan Lucic-esque' boat anchor on your budget and balance sheet for numerous administrations moving forward.
|
How expensive are they to get rid of Locke?