Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
The problem is that this is no different from an assertion that he was completely blameless in the outcome. That is how language works.
Yet somehow we are left with this:
My ONLY point—which you seem to take issue with—has always been that Rittich has played a contributing role to the poor outcome of a few games this season.
|
I am going to back up, and call you out on this.
Two things to consider.
You asked if Rittich was completely blameless on all goals.
But then you are talking about being blameless for the outcome.
Two different things. (Also, context matters!)
Rittich was blameless on 4 of 6 goals, so not all goals.
Flames only scored 3, though, so he is blameless for the outcome (which I consider the L)
So I can have it both ways.
I win. �� <- picture of trophy that may have disappeared