It’s a pretty obvious double standard in how things were looked at.
If you are agitated or bothered, relax man, I’m just poking a wee bit of fun.
Team performance - you are considering the full season body of work, downplaying the importance of a significant block of recent games, and including discussion of how a 6 GA loss was significantly due to circumstance.
Goalies - you spent a lot of energy relying on inclusion of stats from a 6 goal against game, saying that the stats say the goalie should have been better, included the data from that game within a chunk of data selected from a certain date onwards.
So Calgary was the better team than Toronto, losing 6-2. When Tampa destroyed Calgary on the ice, and won 6-1, the goalie wasn’t as good as he should have been. Because.. sv%.
Those are your opinions.
That is kind of funny, and if you truly don’t see that there is a parallel, well, I can’t help you.
|