I don't question his investigative facts, but he would have done better with me if he hadn't forced himself to eat to the point of vomiting. C'mon, almost anyone else would just stop eating. If he had just said, "That's all, I am full" I would have respected his results more. As it is, I wonder if he didn't just force himself into getting sick and maybe if he had avoided gorging himself he may have had different results.
I still think fastfood more than once a week is not healthy.
I hadn't thought about McDonalds conditioning children but he does bring up good points.
His cravings and emotional swings were very interesting.
How long it took to lose the weight was interesting.
But him forcing himself to eat to the point of vomiting just "coloured" the results in my mind.
Would the same things happen if he only ate McDonalds but not to excess at every sitting?
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|