Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
It just doesn't make sense based on the player coming back. It's not like Zucker is on some huge tear or looking like he's significantly outplaying his contract value etc.
I see him as being incentive to replace Neal while giving you a better player with slightly better cap hit.
a 1st and kylington gets into the stratosphere of assets that i'm not sure the wild have or would see the need to move.
IMO, you move a 1st with neal to get rid of the contract entirely to do another move that sees you bring in salary, you don't move a 1st + neal to take back 20 million in salary liability for a guy on pace for ~35 points.
|
I'm not convinced a team would take on Neal right now for a late 1st. He really needs to show something when he comes back, or next year, otherwise he is in buyout territory.