Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Keep in mind Boomer said the return was more than Frolik+1st.
So that wasn't the deal.
And I don't think he would say that if it was Neal+1st.
So basically it was Froli+1st plus something else of value?
EDIT: or maybe it wasn't Frolik at all but rather Kylington which I would equate to being "much more". And maybe explains the earlier deal for Fantensternberger
|
Yikes. a 1st & Kylington for Zucker?