Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
... or, if the city owns the building, and the Flames pay a lease.
...or, through some agreement that provides mutual benefit to both parties.
Let’s wait and see what the deal is.
|
That's a terrible starting point.
I get the feeling the deal will be better for the Flames than the City. Otherwise the Flames would have been more receptive to the last deal. And this time around, it will be moved along under the guise of NDA's, close door negotiating, and no public input.
I hope i'm wrong, but the only way a deal gets done is if public funds are used in a way that massively benefits the Flames. Why else would the Flames come back to the table?