View Single Post
Old 02-20-2019, 04:48 PM   #23
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Normally I can understand, if not agree, from both perspectives but this one just seems bad by Minnesota.

Coyle was an important impact player in recent years with a year left with a solid caphit (less so salary as it was backloaded).

Donato is a fine prospect but not the type of player that should get you to move a 20-30-50 type player.
Especially when good rfas are getting huge money. Coyle is making 3rd/4th line money but capable of 2nd line ice time. If he was a ufa this deal is ok but to me that is a poor return for a good player with a good contract
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote