Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
Look, the analytics guys know the limitations of what they are measuring. Not sure why you seem defensive of it. They want to improve but know there is a practical limitation in manual data gathering
I see with my eyes things that contribute to making goals happen. These things aren’t measured. That is known. Models don’t use it yet. Why not talk about it?
I won’t ask you not to keep going with whatever you’re doing.
Just if you want to draw conclusions, why not acknowledge the limitations of the available data?
|
I'm not defensive at all.
I'm just putting an objective measure ahead of one hockey fan's view of particular goals that seem to suggest you can ignore stats.
You won't get an argument that a certain chance is more dangerous or less dangerous than another, but unless you're willing to take on that project I gave you there isn't a replacement for a zone plus entry distinction stat for assessing GSAA and xSV%.
Even if you actually took on that project you'd still be one guy doing it that may have a bias going in by the looks of it.