Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
So vote 1 you’re worried about hammer, but vote 2 you are fine with it because you are going to bed and don’t want to be a no voter (post 480). Why was it so important to have a vote on him? Seems to me like you wanted to have that on the record for down the road.
|
I didn't want to set up hammer too early because we still had a lot of time. SebC unvoted, so I cast my vote. But crazy_eoj voted too, setting up hammer, so I moved off again. Then nothing happened that would have changed my feelings, so I did vote again for him before going to bed.
The bolded part just makes no sense at all. Are you seriously asking me why I did vote on someone I was suspicious of instead of not voting at all? Isn't voting out mafia members the goal of the game? You're grasping at straws. Are you seriously holding my vote against an Oiler against me? If I were an Oiler and wanted "to have something on the record", I could have just passed on voting for him again, pointed to my intention shown in 442 and said "see, I
wanted to vote for him!"