View Single Post
Old 02-11-2019, 01:48 PM   #9567
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manwiches View Post
https://theathletic.com/809372/2019/...or-mark-stone/

Good article on reasoning behind going all in on Stone.

I won't break the paywall, but the proposed trade goes something like

Jankowski, Czarnik, 2019 1st, 2020 2nd, and Kylington.

Even breaks out scenarios to keep Stone, by offloading salary in a few different forms.

Good read if you have subscription
That cost doesn't seem realistic for a UFA at the deadline.

Karlsson has been with SJ the whole season.

Evander Kane was a pending UFA and traded for a conditional first-round pick, a conditional fourth-round pick and a prospect. I'd suggest the cost to acquire Mark Stone would be closer to the Kane price than Karlsson's.
AC is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post: