Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
you've impulsively revenge-voted quite a bit in this game, you gave GGG the chance to off himself, you argued for and succeeded in forcing a tie and you dared a player to vote himself out. Sorry if I'm harsh here, but I fail to see how any of that stuff helps us.
and I didn't say it was. But it's also not my fault that there is no movement all day and people all of a audden go berserk in the final hour when I'm not around.
we only learn through cardflips, and we only win if we lynch people. A tie takes away both things, doesn't it?
Nightkilling DropIt is a weird decision. With him squirming and throwing dirt everywhere in order to save himself would have again made him a prime lynch target, I wonder why he was killed. Maybe because it's all too convenient to you and your "see? we only lost DropIt instead of him + X" pitch.
|
So in the same post you claim I "impulsively revenge-voted," which I have addressed and admitted to on day 1 as there was very little information. Then you attempt to develop a highly complex theory at the end and tie it to me. So which is it? Am I complex or simple?
I am transparent and new, I have learned the in and outs of this and asked for clarity about forcing a tie which I still stand by. I explained my Scornfire vote and was simply playing out some banter with him in the nature of the game.
I have a working theory regarding Puxlut which includes her behaviour at the end of the last night. However, if you want to continue down the path of pointing at me I can live with that, just know you will be flipping another town and be prepared to further your investigation on those grounds. I am fine with being voted out as long as our team wins. I stand by my current vote.