Originally Posted by crazy_eoj
Awesome work Flames Fans, grabbing two oiler trolls on the first two days is pretty impressice.
After re-reading the entire thread, I'm suspicious of Scornfire. He spent the first few pages of the game simply trying to lay low (as mentioned in post #244 when Pux asks about investigating people who posted later in the day, I hadn't even seen the PM until the next day, I was at 38 posts the end of day 1, twice your combined day 1/2 count), claiming to not be available, and posting frequently about how the game was 'too meta' or dissapointing (It was, I'll forgive you for having to look up the meaning and somehow collating that to something) . This would fit with GGG's posting seeming to protect new players. Yet he posted just enough not to be the lowest poster. (See above, not to mention that I was one of the loudest people against this idea of GGG's)
In post 248 he references a conversation between Hockey/Biz/Sebc and then adds on GGG's name after. Seems like he was debating whether to even mention GGG for some reason. (Nope, He's in Post #248 clearly named and post #245 is an easy reference to GGG being the main target, if you read that as him being an Afterthought that's on you)
GGG didn't mention the tied vote between Scornfire and Agulati/Bonded when he flipped his vote from Puxlut to Agulati to try and raise votes on Day 1. Notable omission that was also mentioned by bizaro. (I can't account for other people's #### ups)
Scorn tries to push votes to bizaro and day one (also not a thing, the only time I mention Bizaro is Post #337 as a response to MrKajz asking if anyone would be willing to look elsewhere, being that I thought Bonded and Agulati were both innocent, I was) and repeatedly claimed he doesn't think Bonded is oiler troll. However he is boxed in with a tied vote for either him or Bonded (Wrong) and has to move now, making a great cover. Scornfire does vote for bonded late on game day 1, breaking a tie . But then Bonded calls Scorn 'definitely a townie' even after he votes to lynch him, which is a strange response right before you may be lynched. (I think we've discussed this enough)
Day 2 Scorn comes in with an early theory against me, but making mistakes on the vote count kind of goes quiet when there is no support. (8 Minutes between original post and correction does not fit this narrative) After consensus begins to build on a vote for GGG he has a long post accusing GGG of being a troll, and saying that he's leaning towards a vote on GGG. He never follows through on this vote. (As mentioned in #412/#413 I wasn't confident enough in my reads to vote at that point and it was a blink before we reached threshold on GGG, which meant I didn't need to vote and risking a ban hammer is pure stupidity)
He spends his next few posts instead defending GGG (Citation needed, the strongest argument I give against banning him is not wanting to potentially kill off a strong player *If* there's a possiblity they're flames fans, meanwhile we had 2 players giving us absolutely nothing to consider (you and WF))and being concerned with how the votes are piling up against him. (Do you recall the self ban?) He continually suggests voting for less active players, making sure to sometime mention how he distrusts GGG.
Today again he mentions how he was against GGG the whole time.
Methinks he doth protest too much.
|