[crazy_eoj]

Here's my original post re: scorn

Originally Posted by crazy_eoj

Awesome work Flames Fans, grabbing two oiler trolls on the first two days is pretty impressice.

After re-reading the entire thread, I'm suspicious of Scornfire. He spent the first few pages of the game simply trying to lay low, claiming to not be available, and posting frequently about how the game was 'too meta' or dissapointing. This would fit with GGG's posting seeming to protect new players. Yet he posted just enough not to be the lowest poster.

In post 248 he references a conversation between Hockey/Biz/Sebc and then adds on GGG's name after. Seems like he was debating whether to even mention GGG for some reason.

GGG didn't mention the tied vote between Scornfire and Agulati/Bonded when he flipped his vote from Puxlut to Agulati to try and raise votes on Day 1. Notable omission that was also mentioned by bizaro.

Scorn tries to push votes to bizaro and day one and repeatedly claimed he doesn't think Bonded is oiler troll. However he is boxed in with a tied vote for either him or Bonded and has to move now, making a great cover. Scornfire does vote for bonded late on game day 1, breaking a tie . But then Bonded calls Scorn 'definitely a townie' even after he votes to lynch him, which is a strange response right before you may be lynched.

Day 2 Scorn comes in with an early theory against me, but making mistakes on the vote count kind of goes quiet when there is no support. After consensus begins to build on a vote for GGG he has a long post accusing GGG of being a troll, and saying that he's leaning towards a vote on GGG. He never follows through on this vote.

He spends his next few posts instead defending GGG and being concerned with how the votes are piling up against him. He continually suggests voting for less active players, making sure to sometime mention how he distrusts GGG.

Today again he mentions how he was against GGG the whole time.

Methinks he doth protest too much.