What case? I'd like to hear your argument against me again with the falsehoods removed (The vote count which you already retracted, I didn't push Biz at any point, claiming I included GGG as a "throwin" to the mod convo theory I had when he was very clearly my main target. Taking issue with my early day 2 post claiming I gave up on it when it gained no traction, It was corrected before probably anybody else had opened the thread. What case? The only things I've seen are points that I would imagine were being discussed in troll chat as potential bait for getting votes on me. The strategy was probably to get as many good players out asap as possible and keep the rookies around for easy end game prey, it failed spectacularly day 1 and has probably been well off the rails since mid day 2. Being that I felt GGG was long gaming me day 2 I imagine there's a few tidbits that were floated around, now it's panic mode and I'm the only one with some low hanging fruit to cling to. Why do you sit around the first 2 days and then come out day 3 swinging? What's the impetus for this?
Here's GGG's seed plant on me;
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Scorn at the end has to chose between Agulati and Bonded chooses to keep Agulait based on experience. In this position if Scorn and Bonded are both scum it might make sense to cut their losses and have Scorn vote out Bonded as in that scenario they would both be targets the following day if they didn’t. It would also make sense that Scorn waited so long to place his vote. This works especially well if he is the proxy troll. However I don’t think we go there today.
|
Someone didn't think he'd be gone so soon, but it doesn't change the fact I'm clearly someone the Trolls are trying to plant seeds on here
As for your question, WinnipegFan, who is my backup tonight if we don't get consensus on one of us. If only because he's provided nothing and gave GGG the ability to ban hammer for no reason despite multiple people parroting to keep away from a hammer.