Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Did you miss post #555, or is this your view in spite of it?
|
In spite of it. On it's own it reads pretty good, but I don't really buy it when I start to apply my logic (SebC wording is in italics):
- While I did not end up with a vote on GGG, I still think I had a fairly important role in getting him lynched.
Having an important role in getting him banned doesn't mean you are not an Oiler. It was just accidental - you were just trying to cover your tracks for later
- I said that GGG should be lynched Day 4, even if I'm dead. Am I planning to die before he does, and get him off the hook that way? Why, then, would I not fake a freudian slip or something to advance that plan?
To be honest, I never really understood this Day 4 comment - are you saying this is typo? Maybe I just missed something
- I was aware of the traction that the GGG vote had, and felt a bit guilty for starting it as early as I did in that nothing else really got discussed, thus making it an easy day for mafia to hide their tracks. Disclosing my alternate theory, and the vote to support that, was an attempt to make up for it, and set the game up better going forward.
I guess we can agree here but as I stated, I think you voted for GGG early to cover your tracks and then went into damage control mode once the voting train really took off
- If I were troll, would I really want to move off GGG, knowing that he would flip mafia? Knowing that even if he were to survive the day he would be unlikely to make it to the endgame (with me having said that he should not)? Moving off him only made sense because I did not have certainty of his alignment (nor that of crazy_eoj).
It makes a lot of sense to move off GGG if you are an Oiler as you were trying to stop all the votes going his way (I don't think his banning was certain when you moved off him). With one Oiler down and potentially another one on the block, I really don't think you were thinking about the long game.