Quote:
Originally Posted by Burner
i guess the question is - would you have done Hamilton Fox and a 1st for Hanifin and Lindholm??
|
Knowing what I do now, absolutely. But since we didn't, and got the winning end of that one, there is no need to give up gains from the first trade in a second trade in order to "restructure" it. I don't think a first for rental-Ferland is a good plan. Ferland was a factor in that last game against the flames until the 2nd when he left injured. He also sat with an injury the day before. Its not so much that I would regret giving up an asset in exchange for 4 months of Ferland, it's that I would worry that your only going to get 50% of that 4 months. If your going to make a trade, make a trade for someone that hasn't been injured recently, or for considerable portions of the year to date.