Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno
Yeah, I don't have an issue with Kylington's goal just like I wasn't really upset with the Dallas OT goal against the Flames. Both goalies had enough time to recover IMO.
|
But isn't the fact they had to recover from unnecessary contact interference in itself? Shouldn't it be a penalty then?
Quote:
69.2 Penalty - In all cases in which an attacking player initiates intentional
or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, whether or not the goalkeeper is inside or outside the goal crease, and whether or not a goal is
scored, the attacking player will receive a penalty (minor or major, as the Referee deems appropriate). In all cases where the infraction
being imposed is to the attacking player for hindering the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely in his goal crease, the penalty to be assessed is for goalkeeper interference.
|