Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati
I have clearly stated that I am not sure yet and I would prefer if Winnipegfan would contribute to the discussion.
I still stand by my earlier statement saying that I don't think a poster who has less posts will be a mafia.
It was just a ploy to get Winnipegfan to contribute to the discussion. As he has done so, I am withdrawing my vote for him for the time being.
|
So after I voted agulati, this was the response and I actually think it's pretty reasonable. The vote against Winnipegfan was to try and get some response out of him, and Winnipeg delivered with some posts. agulati accordingly dropped his vote.
So I ask myself, if he was the only Oiler on the vote, would dropping this vote be a good idea? I'm assuming there was only one Oiler out of the four that had votes on Winnipeg, so if agulati is actually an Oiler, then they'd have zero votes on Winnipeg - not sure that is a fantastic strategy as the banning deadline is starting to approach. I'm not totally convinced at this point, so my vote stays for now. However, furthering my thoughts that there was one Oiler out of the four and agulati acting like a Flames fan with a reasonable explanation, my radar is buzzing a bit more for Scorn. He hasn't talked a ton of game yet, so we'll see where that goes, as there is little to get a read on him so far.