Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Likely because you don’t understand the ramifications that present negotiations have on future negotiations.
Getting the best possible deal because you have the leverage on someone can come back to haunt you when the adverse party has the upper hand in future negotiations. There is a definite cost to “putting the screws” to someone just because you can.
Sometimes, a fairer deal might be, in fact, a better deal long term.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
No, I do understand. But saying the best deal isn't the best deal makes no sense... the best deal is the best deal, hence why it is called the best deal. If it weren't the best deal, it would not be called the best deal. It would be called the good deal, or slightly worse than best deal, etc.
Edit: I do understand what you are saying, the initial wording seemed weird to me, that's all.