Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
THAT IS NOT A GOAL.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
First of all, you are correct - it wasn't a goal. There is no way they could have reversed the call based on the evidence.
But if you look at where the webbing of the glove is (which is where the puck would have inevitably ended up), it looks like it might be fully in the net.
Again, no way they can call it a goal. But with proper technology, I think it is.