View Single Post
Old 01-12-2019, 11:13 AM   #15
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
Oh, I agree. Which probably means there is a chance Brodie is traded. Hamonic isn't extended, and we try re-signing him when he is UFA. Flames protect Hanifin, Gio, Andersson, and Valimaki. We lose one of Kylington or Bennett to Seattle.
That's only if they protect 4D, and if they protect 4D, they're only going to
be able to protect 4F. Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Lindholm. We lose one of Backlund/Jankowski/Kylington.

7F/3D You'd be looking at 13/23/19/28/11/77/? + 5/55/8.

It's going to suck to lose either Kylington or Andersson, but we can only lose one, and it's harder to replace centres than defensemen. And I don't want the team to have put all this time into Mark Jankowski only to lose him to Seattle just when he becomes who we thought he'd be ten years earlier.

It also may be worth extending Brodie just for Seattle to take him anyway. If you can get a 30-31 year old Brodie for 5 years at $6M, as a new franchise that's more valuable than Andersson/Kylington. Neither are as good as Brodie yet.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post: