Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Urgency to do what? Something like what Mr. Coffee proposed?
I pretty much agree with him. Transmountain should be a slam dunk, as it's twinning an existing pipeline. That's about as low-impact as it gets. We need to drag things back to where greenfield projects can meet a threshold for approval and make it extremely clear that consultation is not a veto.
|
This.
"We're here to listen and willing to shuffle some pawns around, but the rest of the board is set in stone."
Ultimately nothing makes everyone happy but you cant just abandon all projects because its not all rosy for everyone.
Its the 'Perfection Fallacy.' If it isnt perfect then why bother at all?
Which is heavily flawed reasoning.