Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan
"Now, the onus is on drivers to prove they weren’t impaired when they were on the road. "
Not sure how one does this
|
Remember all those 'slippery slope' arguments that were soundly mocked? Well now here we are discussing how individuals are now responsible for 'proving their innocence.'
That was quick.
It doesnt even take into consideration that a Cop has all of the tools and resources handy and ready at their disposal. They want to fire a quick breathalyzer? Sure. No problem. Costs them nothing and they're on the clock getting paid.
Average person? Even if you're innocent you're looking at paying legal fees, toxicologist fees, time off work and on and on it goes.
Merely on the casual whims of the Police.