Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasi
The trade for Lindholm happened before Neal signed. Now maybe there was some promise to have him get first line duties, but he has to know Lindholm was up for the spot too and that it just wasn’t his.
|
Whoops I’ll have to go back and relisten. Regardless he very carefully skirted around saying that Neal was unhappy here with his situation. If your player sympathetic it can be easily looked at one way and if your management sympathetic it can be looked at as an “attitude” problem.
I just love all the people thinking cause he literally has a puck bounced off him to FINALLY score and it somehow means everything’s been peaches and roses. And to be honest I’ve never bitched about Neal ONCE if we stay the number 1 team in the west and become a cup contender but it means Neal is out there and never scored a goal again for the rest of his contract id be the happiest man on the planet.
Wether he’s putting points up or not we obviously have a team with great chemistry and his borderline zero point output is still apart of that so scoring or not you’ll never hear me say I want him out of here. Now wether Peters feels the same I don’t know?