Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
I'm not saying that it wasn't part of a bigger universe. I'm saying the Marvel universe was not very good or cohesive at that point. Your using hindsight to justify Thor's existence. It was great that Thor introduced Thor and Loki, but that was a bad movie. Half the movie heavily features Kat Dennings and plays like an episode of "2 Broke Girls".
The fact people are comparing that to WW and Aquaman or justifying a heavily positive RT score just proves my point that there is a bias against DC.
|
Lol. That’s rich. The guy calling Thor an episode of 2 broke girls is arguing people are biased against DC.
Thor was better than Aquaman because it had a cohesive plot, character development and wasn’t just a 2 hour special effects bonanza. It also had an actual villain with motivations.
And I didn’t mention this in my previous aquaman posts but Black Manta was without question the most hilariously misused and pathetic villain since emo Peter Parker/venom in Spider-Man 3.