Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Look, I don't think Smith is sabotaging this team. Perhaps the title could've been clearer. But I stand by what I say so it's staying.
|
Yeah, the titling is a quibble. But you made this thread on 15 November, insisting that Mike Smith needed to be replaced “immediately.” In that time the Flames have a 6-1-0 record in his last seven starts.
I tend to think that even amid the current level of frustration we are bound to see this cycle continue—Mike Smith will not be replaced; he will split wins and losses as he has done, occasionally with spectacular performances and often also allowing bad goals and having bad games; posters will spend the season demanding an immediate change. On, and on we will go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk