Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Badger’s Nose is not wrong. An “active” contribution to an outcome is an intentional one. It would be better titled “Mike Smith is costing this team games.”
|
At this point we are obviously just engaged in semantics, but I’m not sure that I agree that an active contribution is an intentional one. You could actively play hockey as the goalie with the intention to win but the outcome could be the opposite to that because you unintentionally let in a soft goal.
Ultimately, I agree with the better title but I’m having a hard time reconciling active with intention.