Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
No. It really wasn't, and no, he did not.
Peluso was right over Koskinen's left pad when the puck went in, and Koskinen was impeded from extending his leg all the way. Draisaitl bumped Grubauer on the leg right before the goal, but it was clearly less egregious than the one the Flames had called back on Sunday.
I think both goals could have been recalled, but it is easy to see why the respective calls were made.
But on that note...
No. Not even favourable goal-calls and officiating can save the Edmonton Oilers.
Nothing can.
Nothing.
|
Disagree that it was less egregious - look at how far he moves the goalies glove immediately before the puck goes by his glove
Quote:
Originally Posted by goflamesgo18
That was clearly interfering with goalies ability to make save. About half second before puck went in. The gif is slow motion. Different refs different opinions i guess. Need more consistency in this league
|
Different refs, whatever. This was challenged and went to Toronto, that’s where the true consistency is needed when they can look at it over and over from multiple angles
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
This is the definition of selective vision. Peluso was touching him the whole time and even was standing on his leg.
Draisaitl skated through and touched him but was out and didn’t interfere with his making the save.
|
Selective vision is right. You can’t see that Draisaitl hitting the goalies glove impeded him from making the save? Come on man