Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I guess I don’t have your crystal ball.
I think valuing a player on a 30 game stretch when his career numbers are what Neal’s are is terribly shortsighted.
It’s nice you want to sell low because it makes you nervous, but it’s a bad call. Plenty of people predicted the end of TJ Brodie, Carolina didn’t think Lindholm would ever be the player he is right now, the whole league is filled with guys who got traded because they would never be something, and they proved people wrong.
So, want to ignore Neal’s career and judge his next 5 years based on 30 games? Go ahead, seems foolish.
|
Sorry, who does he replace on the top 6?