Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
But he isn’t negatively impacting the team, in any way. So what’s the problem?
|
That may be true this year, I doubt they would have spent the extra 2.75 million on another player this year. But next year when we are looking for a goalie we may wish we had the 2.75 million next year and the 7.25 million the two years after when we try to re-sign Hamonic and Brodie and try to get a starting goalie as well.
Next year would you rather have Neal’s 5.75 million going to him or to a starting goalie?