Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent Wookie
As far as all the other responses from you, well, I won't engage any further.
|
Why not? If you disagree we can at least discuss. But this is one of the biggest issues affecting the perception of police, the blue wall of silence anytime another officer does anything potentially wrong. Shut down discussion, remain silent, protect one another. It's more important than your actual mandate.
Why not just give us your perspective on the
facts presented by the Honourable T.C. Semenuk and why it is or is not acceptable that a police officer does this and not only remain with the force but be voted in as president for the police union?
Last response was about discrediting my posts but you've been extremely misleading saying that the police were the ones to charge Kaminski. The Law Enforcement Review Board submitted an inquiry all about how the police failed to investigate the claim. It was a big deal, no one in their right minds thought that there was any due diligence achieved by the CPS. It should have been taken as a huge failure by the police and opportunity to improve, but you seem to be suggesting police did a good job with it?
https://www.solgps.alberta.ca/boards...s/default.aspx
Quote:
|
CPS did not diligently investigate the court’s serious concerns, which were clearly stated. Instead, early on, CPS decided without any apparent evidentiary basis that the only issue was that the officers had taken poor notes about the incident and did not prepare for trial.
|